Posted by Roman Fiedler on Sep 20 Well, splitting the kernel in per module packages may have other advantages, e.g. less data transferred due to using selected small packages only, but I don't know if in age of GBit-networking and huge disks is worth it. Otherwise I would assume, that package selection on diverse hardware might get quite annoying during install: you detect some USB hardware, install some USB controller packages, install them, load the modules, the next run...
Re: A quartet of Linux local root vulns: DirtyAH6, PPPoEject, TUNderflow, and DiagSpill
About this summary. This is a short, independently written summary of an article first published by oss-security. Cyber Security News did not report or verify the underlying story. Read the original: https://seclists.org/oss-sec/2026/q3/846
Source attribution: headline and facts are from oss-security (seclists.org). Summary method: excerpt of the source description. See our source attribution policy.

