Posted by Aaron Rainbolt on Nov 09 I mean, if someone with knowledge of a 0-day decides to act maliciously, I'd much rather them do so by making said 0-day public than by selling it to someone or weaponizing it themselves. If I could encourage everyone in the world with knowledge of a 0-day and desire to act maliciously to post it publicly instead of doing anything worse, I would in a heartbeat. (Of course, I'd rather be able to make them all decide to not behave...
"Malicious" public disclosure is a lot better than other ways of misusing 0-days (Was: [oss-security] Home Assistant: the password is not the key — token secrets in cleartext, two token classes never expire, password change revokes none (2026.11.0, live-p
About this summary. This is a short excerpt from the description that oss-security published with its article. Cyber Security News did not report or verify the underlying story. Read the original: https://seclists.org/oss-sec/2026/q4/623
Source attribution: headline and facts are from oss-security (seclists.org). Summary method: excerpt of the source description. See our source attribution policy.

